The Incident: A Harrowing Ascent
In May 2025, Chinese paraglider Peng Yujiang reportedly experienced a terrifying ordeal when a sudden updraft, known as “cloud suck,” lifted him from an elevation of approximately 3,000 metres to over 8,000 metres above sea level in the Qilian Mountains of Gansu Province. He claimed to have endured freezing temperatures of -40°C and dangerously low oxygen levels during the ascent, leading to frostbite and temporary loss of consciousness. The incident was captured on video and shared widely on Chinese social media platforms, garnering significant attention.
Emergence of Doubts
Subsequent investigations have cast doubt on the authenticity of Peng’s account. Experts in the field of paragliding have questioned the likelihood of such an accidental ascent, suggesting that the presence of specialized equipment and attire, such as heavy mittens and a helmet, indicates preparedness for high-altitude conditions. This raises the possibility that the flight was intentional rather than accidental.
AI-Generated Footage
Further scrutiny of the viral video revealed that portions of the footage appeared to be AI-generated. Analysis by digital verification firm GetReal Labs identified inconsistencies in the video, such as the presence of a logo from Doubao AI, a subsidiary of ByteDance, in the cropped segment. This suggests that parts of the video may have been artificially created, casting doubt on the veracity of the entire footage.
Official Response
In light of these findings, the Gansu Aeronautical Sports Association suspended Peng Yujiang from paragliding activities for six months. Additionally, his associate, Gu Zhimin, who shared the video online, received a similar suspension. The authorities emphasized that the flight lacked prior approval and did not adhere to safety regulations. Consequently, any records associated with the flight will not be officially recognized.
Conclusion
While the incident involving Peng Yujiang highlights the unpredictable dangers of paragliding, the subsequent revelations about the authenticity of the video and the circumstances surrounding the flight have led to a reassessment of the event. The combination of expert skepticism and evidence of AI-generated content necessitates a cautious approach in evaluating the claims made. As investigations continue, it remains to be seen whether the true nature of the incident will be conclusively determined.
